Cases
Samuel Kamau Waweru Vs Platinum Credit Limited
Case Summary.
The Complainant lodged a complaint on 27 November 2024 against the Respondent for constantly sending unsolicited messages and calls promoting its loan products without his consent. On 15 November 2024, a sales representative of the Respondent called the Complainant and had access to his personal information such as his vehicle details. The sales representative informed the Complainant that the Respondent shared such data with the sales team to advertise products to customers. The Complainant had never been a customer to the Respondent and thus had never shared such data with them. The Sales representative was acting as a sales agent of the Respondent at the time of the infringement.
Issues of Determination
I. Whether the Respondent fulfilled its obligations under the Act; and
II.Whether the Complainant is entitled to any remedies under the Act and the attendant Regulation.
Determination
The Respondent, Platinum Credit Limited is a data controller as the sales representative who sent the unsolicited messages to the Complainant was acting as their agent. The Respondent thus unlawfully processed the Complainant’s personal data for commercial purposes without consent from the Complainant. As a result, the Respondent was directed to compensate the Complainant KES. 400,000/=. The ODPC also recommended a prosecution for the Respondents Directors for providing false and misleading information to the office by denying having known the sales person and that they were not aware of the respondent .
Analysis
This case highlights the importance of getting a data subject consent before processing such data for commercial use to avoid violation of Section 37 of the Act. It is key to ensure that personal data held by a data controller is accurate and obtained with the consent of the controller before the same is shared with data processors for processing. Additionally, to avoid violation of Section 57 of the Act and avoid prosecution, It is key for data controllers and processors to avoid provision of false and misleading information to the Office for investigation.