Cases
Lucy Kinyanjui vs Easy Coach Limited
Case Summary
Lucy Kinyanjui lodged a complaint with the Office of the Data Protection Commissioner (ODPC) on April 11, 2023, against Easy Coach Limited, a Kenyan bus transportation company. The complaint arose after Kinyanjui, a passenger on one of the Respondent’s vehicles on April 10, 2023, received phone calls from a third party accusing her of stealing luggage, addressing her by name. The Complainant alleged that her personal details, including her name and phone number, were accessed from the Respondent’s passenger manifest without her consent. She claimed that Easy Coach admitted the third party likely obtained her details from the manifest. The ODPC notified the Respondent on June 13, 2023, and conducted investigations based on the complaint and the Respondent’s response.
Issues for Determination
1. Whether the Respondent collects, stores, and processes personal data in accordance with the Data Protection Act, 2019.
2. Whether the Respondent fulfilled the duty to notify under Section 29 of the Act.
3. Whether there was a legal basis for processing personal data as per Section 30 of the Act.
4. Whether the Respondent has deployed sufficient mitigation measures to address similar complaints.
Determination
The Office of the Data Protection Commissioner determined that Easy Coach Limited adhered to the Data Protection Act, 2019, in its collection, storage, and processing of personal data as per Section 25. The company fulfilled its duty to notify under Section 29 by informing the Complainant of data collection purposes through its accessible Privacy Policy, accepted during booking. It was also found to have a legal basis under Section 30 for processing the Complainant’s data to fulfill a travel service contract. However, the data was to be stored securely and not be disclosed without the Complainant’s consent. In this case, a third party unlawfully accessed the Complainant’s personal data, which formed the basis of the complaint. In response, the Respondent demonstrated that they had implemented remedial measures, including redacting passenger manifest details, conducting staff training, and updating its data protection policies. The ODPC directed Easy Coach to submit proof of staff training within seven days, with an enforcement notice to be issued if they failed to comply.
Analysis
This case highlights the importance of safeguarding personal data to prevent unauthorized access, as mandated by Section 25 of the Data Protection Act, 2019. The unauthorized access to the Complainant’s personal data by a third party underscores the risks associated with sharing sensitive information, such as passenger manifests, without adequate protection. The Respondent’s acknowledgment that the manifest was shared with drivers, potentially leading to the breach, emphasizes the need for robust data protection measures. The ODPC’s findings affirm that while Easy Coach had a legal basis for data collection and processing, the incident revealed vulnerabilities in data handling practices. The mitigation measures, such as redacting manifests and enhancing staff training, align with Section 41’s requirement for technical and organizational safeguards. This case serves as a precedent for organizations to prioritize data security and transparency to uphold data subjects’ rights under the Act.