Cases
Lawrence M'impwi Kirima Vs Solar Panda Company Kenya Limited
Case Summary.
Lawrence M’impwi Kirima (the Complainant) lodged a complaint with the ODPC on 15 October 2024 against the respondent, Solar Panda Company Kenya Limited. The complainant alleged that the respondent used his image without consent and lawful basis to advertise its products contrary to Section 37 of the Act. The complainant became aware of the same in 2022 and made inquiries to the respondent on the same and produced both the email correspondence and the marketing fliers as evidence before the ODPC. The Respondent contended that the complainant was a field agent who conducted sales at a commission and that the photo was taken as a field agent. The photo was then stored in their library and was later retrieved for the sole purpose of improving visibility of field agents. The respondent also stated that the field agreement between themselves and the complainant was entered in July 2029 before the enactment of the DPA.
Issues for determination.
i. Whether the Respondent obtained consent from the Complainant as required by the Act for the use of his image for commercial purposes; and
ii. Whether the Complainant is entitled to any complaints under the Act and the attendant Regulations
Determination.
The respondent used the Complainant’s image in its product marketing fliers and was thus required to obtain the Complainant’s consent for commercial use of his image. The ODPC found that there was no form of consent by the Complainant for their use of data for commercial use and thus the Respondent did not obtain requisite consent for commercial use of the Complaint’s image. The respondent was found liable for the infringement of the Complainants data privacy and the ODPC directed the respondent to compensate the Complainant KES. 500,000/= for the infringement.
Analysis.
The case highlights the importance of obtaining explicit consent from data subjects before using such data for commercial use. In this case the respondent could not discharge their duty to proof that the Complainant had consented for use of his image for commercial purposes. It also highlights the need for employers to update contracts that were drafted before the enactment with the DPA to align with the data protection rights and provisions. It is critical for data controllers and processors to adhere with Section 30 of the act by ensuring processing of personal data is based on consent or any other lawful basis. Additionally it is key to ensure that commercial use of personal data is as per Section 37 of the Act in that it is based on express consent of a data subject.