Cases
Kennedy Omondi Ochieng Vs Fingrow Capital Limited
Case Summary.
The Complainant took a credit facility from the respondent and had a conversation on repayment with the respondent. The respondent through its general manager retrieved the Complainants financial information and shared it with ABC Bank’s Customer service email making it accessible to numerous individuals in the bank. The Complainant lodged a complaint on 28 November 2024 against the Respondent claiming that the email was sent to his colleagues and the guarantor without consent. Such information included his National ID, letter of promotion, pay slips, guarantors personal details such as ID numbers, telephone. The Respondent did not respond to the complaint.
Issues of determination
- Whether the Complaint’s personal data was lawfully processed; and
- Whether the Complaint is entitled to any remedies under the Act and the attendant Regulations.
Determination
The transmission of the Complainant's financial and other personal data by the Respondent to the Complainant’s colleagues and Guarantor’s amounted to unlawful disclosure. The respondents did not establish any lawful basis of processing the Complainant’s data. As a result the Respondent was ordered to compensate the claimant KES. 200,000/=
Analysis
This case emphasizes the need to process personal data lawfully by adhering to Section 30 of the Act. Transmission of personal data to third parties should be by consent of the data subject or other lawful basis which a data processor or controller should be able to show. The Respondent in this case did not show that lawful basis of transmission of the Complaint’s data to third parties.