Cases
Benson Odiwuor Otieno Vs Digital Regenesys Limited
Case Summary.
The complainant lodged a complaint on 20 November 2024 against the Respondent. The Respondent had been sending unsolicited promotional and marketing messages to the complainant without their consent. The Respondent send unsolicited whatsapp messages to the Complainant on the course fees and urging early enrollment on the 28 October 2024 and despite the Complainant reply to the message with “STOP”, he further received another promotional message on the Respondents Artificial Intelligence Course and payment options on the 29 October 2024.The Complainant had explicitly and repeatedly objected to the Respondent via a formal cease and desist notice to the Respondent but yet received more messages.
Issues of determination
I. Whether the Complainant’s personal data was lawfully processed; and
II. Whether the Complainant is entitled to any remedies under the Act and the attendant Regulations.
Determination
The Respondent did not file a response to the Complaint and was unable to prove a lawful basis of procession of the Complainant’s data and was thus liable for commercial use of data without consent as per section 37 of the Act. The Respondent was thus ordered to delete the Complainant’s personal data from its systems , stop contacting him and avail proof of the same to the Office within 7 days and an enforcement Notice was also issued to the Respondent. The respondent was also ordered to pay the Complainant KES. 200,000/= as compensation.
Analysis
The case highlights the importance of ensuring that commercial use of personal data is based on consent in line with section 37 of the Act. Data Controllers and processors should ensure that opt out mechanisms are effective to ensure adherence to data subject’s rights to object processing of personal data.