Cases
Ruphus Muita vs. Risine Credit Limited & Wakanda Credit Limited
Case Summary
On September 26, 2023, Ruphus Muita filed a complaint with the Office of the Data Protection Commissioner (ODPC) against two digital credit providers, Risine Credit Limited and Wakanda Credit Limited. The complaint pertained to a money lending product called Kashway, which the complainant alleged had unlawfully contacted him regarding an overdue loan. Specifically, the complaint involved the product sending a message instructing the complainant to inform a third party about the loan. The complainant argued that this action constituted a violation of his privacy rights under the Data Protection Act, 2019.
The ODPC, upon receiving the complaint, notified both respondents of the allegations and requested a response, including evidence on how they obtained and processed the complainant’s personal data. Despite these notifications, the respondents did not provide any response or evidence. Consequently, the ODPC proceeded to make a determination based on the available evidence and the applicable legal provisions.
Issues for Determination
- Whether there was a violation of the complainant’s rights under the Act.
- Whether the respondents fulfilled their obligations under the Act.
- Whether the complainant is entitled to any remedies under the Act and the attendant regulations.
Determination
The ODPC found that the respondents violated the complainant’s rights under the Data Protection Act, 2019. The respondents also failed to fulfil their obligations under the Act, leading to an Enforcement Notice and an order for nominal damages of Kshs. 25,000 to be paid to the complainant by each respondent.
Analysis
Whether there was a violation of the Complainant’s rights under the Act
The complainant is a data subject under the Data Protection Act, 2019, which provides specific rights, including the right to be informed about the use of their personal data (Section 26(a)). The evidence included a screenshot of a message from Kashway, showing that the complainant was asked to inform another individual about an overdue loan. This action required prior consent from the complainant, which was not obtained, thereby violating his rights.
Whether the respondents fulfilled their obligations under the Act
As data controllers and processors, the respondents are obligated under Section 25 of the Act to process personal data lawfully, fairly, and transparently. They must also notify data subjects about the collection and use of their data as per Section 29. The respondents’ failure to respond to the ODPC’s notifications and to provide a legal basis for processing the complainant’s data indicates non-compliance with these obligations. Section 28(1) requires data to be collected directly from the data subject, and Section 30 mandates consent for processing personal data.
Whether the complainant is entitled to any remedies under the Act and the attendant regulations
The ODPC, under Section 58 of the Act, issued an Enforcement Notice against the respondents for failing to fulfil their obligations. Additionally, Section 65(1) and (4) of the Act entitle the complainant to compensation for the damage and distress caused by the breach. Consequently, each respondent is ordered to pay Kshs. 25,000 in nominal damages to the complainant.